Health Market

With high gas prices and global warming on many people’s minds, consumers are looking for ways they can participate in energy conservation and reduce their carbon footprint. And while you may not be ready to buy a Toyota Prius or install solar panels in your home, there a number of everyday things you can do to adopt a green living lifestyle and contribute to energy conservation.

Learn how to be eco friendly and protect the environment without breaking the bank with these 10 Energy Saving Tips..

? Think green and plant trees [link to: NW Am. Forests page]. If you’re wondering how to be eco-friendly, one of the best – and greenest – ways is to plant trees around your yard or office. Trees are inexpensive, require little maintenance and act as filters by constantly removing air pollution from the atmosphere.

? Recycle. Recycling is still one of the most effective ways to reduce waste and lessen demand for the use of new natural resources. A growing number of communities now offer the service for free or little charge and have recycling drop-off centers that are easy to access.

? Compost your fruit/vegetable scraps. Scraps like melon rinds, banana peels, carrot scrapings, apple cores and tea bags are wonderful for composting. The average kitchen produces over 200 pounds of waste annually, and by composting, you’ll reduce waste and create wonderfully nitrogen-rich soil for your garden

? Shop at a farmers market instead of a chain grocery store. Buying locally helps energy conservation because it uses less fuel to get food to market. Added green living benefits include fewer pesticides used due to shorter time from farm to table, all while supporting the local economy.

? Fly less. Airline flights account for an estimated 10 percent of all greenhouse gases. Encourage energy saving methods at your work by taking advantage of videoconferencing or telecommuting if the business situation permits.

? Take advantage of public transportation or carpooling. The fuel you’ll conserve will add less CO2 to the environment and keep more dollars in your wallet.

? Become an energy efficient home. Install energy saving light bulbs and low flow shower heads in your home. You’ll save energy and your energy conservation efforts will results will be reflected in your bill.

? Learn how to be eco-friendly in your home. Use eco-friendly cleaning products around the house and yard. The price difference is minimal and many of the eco-friendly products have been shown to clean just as well as their less-green counterparts. Instead of cleaning with paper towels, get into the routine of using old towels, t-shirts or rags to save on additional waste.

? Buy reusable shopping bags. Considering your energy saving efforts, you should no longer ask yourself the question of “paper or plastic.” Canvas totes are now widely available at most grocery stores and are cheap, sturdy alternatives to traditional shopping bags.

? Green living and green entertaining. When the next opportunity to entertain presents itself, whether it be a family function, backyard BBQ or dinner party, use real plates, cups and silverware. You’ll reduce waste and create a more hospitable environment for your guests.

Regardless of your current green living status, these helpful tips on how to be eco friendly can help protect the environment without breaking the bank and can be easily applied to your daily routine. Start slow and try adopting a new energy saving method each month and the results will be gratifying.

Heat waves, Public health and mitigation.

Dr.Kedar Karki

Global climate change is almost certain to increase the frequency and intensity of heat waves. Over the last fifty years we have seen an increase in heat wave events, an increase scientists believe is the result at least in part, of human activity. Had it not been so in our own country until few year ago this phenomena use to occur in few particular part areas like Nepalganj, Bhairahawa but these days even Kathmandu valley itself is not aloof of it. Normal pattern of rainfall now becomes a story of past. Prolong spell of dry spell since last autumn rain is still continue when monsoon will start and what will be its pattern for metrologist it seems to be uphill task to predict. The recently released Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that heat waves will very likely increase over most land areas over the course of this century. Conservative modeling estimates predict that these increases, absent significant reductions in carbon emissions, will result in a 70% increase in heat-wave deaths in the world over the next forty years. Heat waves differ in important respects from natural disasters like hurricanes or earthquakes. Our collective memory about these events fades quickly once temperatures return to normal. Few people seem to remember, for example, that the Chicago heat wave of 1995 killed more than 700 people, or that more than 52,000 Europeans perished in the extreme heat of the summer of 2003–including more than 14,800 in France alone. Even the 2006 deadly heat wave in California, in which at least 140 and as many as 466 people died, has faded quickly from public consciousness. Furthermore, a prolonged heat wave during the summer of 1980, during which researchers estimate that between 1,500 and 10,000 people perished, has been long forgotten. Increased heat waves from climate change are not, of course, the only catastrophic effects expected from global warming. Some of the most dramatic effects may require large structural and political changes. For example, massive sea level rise will require infrastructure investments to protect vulnerable shorelines, and prolonged drought may cause political upheaval and unrest in areas of the world where water is already scarce. The good news about increased heat waves, by contrast, is that we already posses the know-how to respond to the corresponding increase in health risk. Heat waves are not a new phenomenon, and some jurisdictions have made impressive strides in reducing heat-wave deaths. But many jurisdictions across the world are ill-prepared to cope. If Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath have taught us anything, it is that we need local, contextualized preparation taking into account cultural, social and economic realities to minimize catastrophe. The phenomenon of heat waves is being considered for two reasons. First, heat waves already pose a large health threat to our most vulnerable populations and, though we possess the means and know-how to prevent many heat-wave deaths, many world jurisdictions are unprepared to cope. Second, the future looks even worse.

As the IPCC Fourth Assessment warns, global climate change will very likely increase the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events over the course of the 21st century. Unless we engage in efforts to mitigate the worst effects of extreme heat, heat death tolls will dwarf current annual rates. The numbers of those who die from excess heat annually are already significant: more people die heat-related deaths annually in the tropics on average, than from any other natural disaster. Though most of us are simply uncomfortable when the temperatures rise, a much more dire consequence of excess heat is a rapid rise in mortality rates, particularly among the most vulnerable populations.

 

 The elderly, the poor, the socially isolated, and the mentally and physically ill are at the highest risk of dying of heatstroke and other heat-related illness. Average annual deaths by heat stroke between 1979 and 2003 conservatively total 354 and, in actuality, are likely closer to 1,800 per year. In contrast, annual deaths from hurricanes total 149 and would plummet to 21 deaths per year if not for the devastating gulf coast hurricanes of 2005. Nevertheless, heat waves rarely provoke a massive government response. The 1980 heat wave is listed only because it was accompanied by widespread drought, causing massive agricultural losses. Current policy and academic attention to climate change is appropriately directed most intensely on efforts to stabilize and ultimately reduce carbon emissions in order to slow the earth’s warming. Regardless of those efforts, warming is, and will continue to occur. Accompanying that warming will be more frequent and more intense episodes of extreme heat. Even the most aggressive greenhouse gas reduction efforts will not protect us from some of the negative effects of higher temperatures. Thus, the aim here is to focus not on efforts to reduce carbon emissions but on how to mitigate one of the negative effects of warming–mortality caused by increased heat waves that will inevitably occur. Central to any mitigation strategy is the need to understand why the general public and many policymakers pay little attention to the relatively large annual heat-wave death toll.

Several explanations, drawing from research on risk perception, and ultimately conclude that the lack of property damage from excess heat helps explain why heat waves and heat-wave deaths recede quickly from our collective memory. Indeed, because heat waves cause no property damage, they directly affect a smaller absolute number of victims and generate neither destructive media images nor government sponsored cleanup efforts. As a result, heat waves are less memorable events and, as risk perception studies would predict, recede quickly from our collective memory.

 

 The heat wave mitigation strategies and linking them to what we know from risk perception literature in order to improve their effectiveness. Estimates of deaths as a result of excess heat come from two separate sources. Some counts include only those deaths where a death certificate lists excessive heat or heat stroke as a cause of death. Heat stroke occurs when the body heats to at least 105 [degrees]F and cannot cool itself. Heatstroke happens quite quickly and causes increasingly serious symptoms, including disorientation, delirium and coma. Those who survive heat stroke are at high risk for organ failure and death within a year.

 

But heat stroke is not the only cause of increased mortality during a heat wave. Researchers have long noted that average daily death rates increase rapidly during the second or third day of a heat wave and stay elevated during the period of prolonged heat. Individuals with cardiac disease, for example, are at higher risk of death during heat waves because excess heat creates pressure on the cardiovascular system to cool the body; similarly, those suffering from respiratory ailments have an increased risk of death because heat waves are often accompanied by increases in air pollution and small particulate matter. Thus, many death counts for heat waves are calculated by using an excess mortality measure, which basically involves subtracting the expected mortality from actual daily death rates. Deaths from means other than heat stroke during heat waves are typically a much higher percentage than heat stroke deaths.

If climate change projections are accurate, the next forty years may bring annual death rates from heat waves in the world in excess of the death toll from single Hurricane Katrina. The already high heat related death toll remains largely invisible to the general public and many policy makers. Complex reas

ons account for this lack of visibility, including the nature of the victims, the lack of property damage heat waves create, and cognitive mechanisms that cause the lay public and policymakers to underestimate the risks of excess heat and, in turn, to fail to take steps to mitigate its worst effects. Nevertheless, the mechanisms to avoid high numbers of heat-wave deaths exist. The central question is whether vulnerable jurisdictions will act before a calamitous heat wave occurs.

In today’s marketplace, Green Living Homes have taken on a different connotation and seem to inspire different emotions as well.  In these economic times, it seems that you can’t do Green Living Homes without some sort of a major overhaul of your home , or so it seems.  When a new administration enters the White House, somebody or some group seems to think they may have a voice.  In America, the Green lovers are of the mindset that the next President will be so for them.

Granted, I am not coming at you from an environmentalist mindset.  In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.  I am of the mindset that a lot of the Green thinking borders on the “Guilt” aspect that characterizes  you  as bad if you aren’t Green for some reason.

Quite honestly, the Green movement can be a bit radical in its propagation of their overall message and, from a design standpoint, the lens that I often gage things, the materials have not been there to justify a Green Living Home.  That has begun to change with some great new design materials that has started to spark the interest of the design community, and, more importantly, become more reasonable from a price standpoint.

Now, here are some things you can do to be more Green just by making changes in the things you do everyday and in future design changes that you may be making in your home.

First, if you are about to do an Interior Design change, look at your electrical systems.  There can be a tremendous waste in your electrical output systems.  Even if you are not doing Interior Design changes , walk around your home and see it there are ways you can reduce some of you electrical waste.  If you just did some minor changes in the way you used your electricity by making sure appliances are turned off when not in use, etc, you could probably realize a 6% to 20 % difference in you bill each month a recent study showed.

From a Design standpoint, it goes without saying to spend the extra money for the  energy efficient appliances.  An option that is not as difficult to do these days, but still needs to be thoughtfully considered.

There are some simple changes from a lighting standpoint by changing out some of the bulbs that are claiming to be more efficient.  I am not talking about going crazy and just start changing them out, but when you need to make a change, do so then. 

Also look at you filters in heating and air conditioning units.  My Dad was a heating and air guy for years and was always shocked as to how people just wouldn’t take the time to change the filters which would cause countless dollars in repair bills yearly.  There are some pretty decent filtration systems, but are still a little pricey compared to regular ole filters.

Finally, from a Kitchen Design standpoint, Bamboo and cork flooring should be considered in Interior Design, as they are dynamic looking.  Kitchen cabinets can also be redone with similar alternatives to wood which can like just like exotic woods. 

There are some great looking Metal and Stone alternatives which are also good for Kitchen counters and cabinets and a great product, IceStone, one brand of recycled glass used to create countertops for kitchens and bathrooms that generally ranges between $100 and $150 a square foot. 

The point is that there is finally coming into the market place a great plethora of products that are Green focused to design and live in your  Green house.  With the changes you can make from a Design standpoint and just the changes you do by walking around the house, you can be Green.  Just don’t let it be out of guilt. 

It’s kind of like when I used to eat Twinkies that I loved so much and said that sooner or later there would be a low-fat version, and I was right. 

Its the same with going Green.  They’ll catch up.